🔗 Share this article

T reprieve resulting from the ceasefire in Gaza is immense. In Israel, the liberation of the living hostages has sparked extensive joy. In Gaza and the West Bank, jubilations are taking place as as many as 2,000 Palestinian prisoners are being freed – even as anguish lingers due to ambiguity about who is being freed and their destinations. Throughout Gaza's northern regions, civilians can finally reenter search the debris for the remains of an approximated 10,000 unaccounted-for individuals.

Peace Breakthrough Contrary to Previous Doubts

Just three weeks ago, the likelihood of a ceasefire appeared remote. But it has taken effect, and on Monday Donald Trump journeyed from Jerusalem, where he was applauded in the Knesset, to Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. There, he participated in a high-powered diplomatic gathering of over 20 world leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer. The plan for peace initiated there is set to advance at a assembly in the UK. The US president, cooperating with international partners, successfully brokered this deal come to fruition – contrary to, not owing to, Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Palestinian Statehood Hopes Moderated by Previous Experiences

Hopes that the deal signifies the initial move toward Palestinian statehood are understandable – but, considering previous instances, somewhat optimistic. It lacks a transparent trajectory to sovereignty for Palestinians and endangers splitting, for the immediate period, Gaza from the West Bank. Furthermore the utter devastation this war has caused. The absence of any timeline for Palestinian self-governance in the presidential proposal undermines self-aggrandizing mentions, in his Knesset speech, to the “monumental start” of a “era of prosperity”.

The US president was unable to refrain from polarising and making personal the deal in his speech.

In a time of respite – with the liberation of detainees, truce and restart of aid – he decided to reinterpret it as a morality play in which he exclusively restored Israel’s prestige after purported treachery by previous American leaders Obama and Biden. This even as the Biden administration previously having attempted a comparable agreement: a truce connected with humanitarian access and eventual political talks.

Genuine Autonomy Vital for Legitimate Peace

A proposal that withholds one side genuine autonomy cannot yield sustainable agreement. The halt in hostilities and humanitarian convoys are to be embraced. But this is not currently diplomatic advancement. Without systems guaranteeing Palestinian engagement and authority over their own organizations, any deal threatens freezing oppression under the discourse of peace.

Aid Necessities and Recovery Hurdles

Gaza’s people urgently require humanitarian aid – and food and medicines must be the initial concern. But restoration cannot wait. Within 60 million tonnes of debris, Palestinians need assistance reconstructing residences, schools, healthcare facilities, places of worship and other establishments shattered by Israel’s incursion. For Gaza’s provisional leadership to thrive, funding must arrive promptly and protection voids be remedied.

Comparable with a large portion of the president's resolution initiative, mentions to an international stabilisation force and a suggested “peace council” are disturbingly unclear.

Global Backing and Future Prospects

Strong worldwide endorsement for the Palestinian leadership, allowing it to take over from Hamas, is likely the most encouraging scenario. The enormous suffering of the past two years means the moral case for a solution to the conflict is possibly more urgent than ever. But while the halt in fighting, the homecoming of the hostages and pledge by Hamas to “remove weapons from” Gaza should be recognized as favorable developments, the president's track record offers minimal cause to have faith he will fulfill – or consider himself obligated to try. Short-term relief does not mean that the possibility of a Palestinian state has been advanced.